How to Steal a Million Votes

 

How to Steal a Million Votes

©2020  Ross Williams

 

In the coming weeks, if not days, if not hours, some “progressive” [ironic term] will pull up a handful of reports made by “investigative journalists” [anachronistic term] over the years proving and science-settling once and for all that vote fraud does not occur, ever.  And when it does it is so rare that it doesn’t matter.

 

There’s just one problem with these “investigations”, though.  They are deliberately dishonest.

 

Every single Vote Fraud Doesn’t Happen report is pinioned upon the rate of criminal conviction …which is virtually nil.  The problem with that high standard is that it’s nearly impossible − in a nation with secret balloting − to convict someone beyond a reasonable doubt.  For all practical purposes, anyone convicted of vote fraud is someone who was actually caught in the act or admitted to it.  And if he admitted to it, it’s quite likely that he wasn’t aware that what he was doing was wrong.  That leaves being caught in the act.  And because we don’t − with the lone exception of absentee voting − require verification of identity by any means, the chances of being caught fraudulently voting are virtually nonexistent.

 

Vote fraud occurs where a vote is illegally cast even if no one steps up to admit doing it, or is caught in the act.

Vote fraud occurs where a vote is illegally cast and the vote counters reject it for being fraudulent.

 

Vote fraud occurs even where voter registration knowingly and deliberately signs up people to cast votes illegally. …even if those illegally registered voters don’t cast illegal votes.

 

The counter-argument − such as it is − is inevitably, “But it doesn’t make any difference; it’s so rare that it doesn’t change anything.”

You don’t know that because the number of total fraudulent votes actually recorded is never determined …because we can’t determine it currently.  Over fourteen thousand dead people voted in Michigan during the 2020 general election headlined by the race between Donnie Combover and Sniffy P deFile.  The fact that most, or even all, of those dead person votes were thrown out doesn’t matter.  It still occurred. And we don’t know how many similarly fraudulent votes were not thrown out.  In Michigan or elsewhere.

 

The side of the American political spectrum intent on disputing the possibility of rampant vote fraud in the US has recently spent four straight years, and will likely spend a few more decades, claiming that Russia ‘interfered’ with the 2016 election to the point of illegality.  As I said at the time, there’s only a slim handful of way to illegally alter the valid results of an election, none of which Russia did nor could have done.  Russia wasn’t even accused of these things.  However, Americans with immediate access to the election systems can easily accomplish most:

1] alter votes after they are cast;

2] rig the vote-counting mechanism so that 2+2=3 in Column A but 2+2=5 in Column B;

3] cast votes when you are not allowed to vote at all, or cast multiple votes.

 

The US no longer uses the traditional paper ballots filled out in pencil.  Where paper ballots are used, they are filled in with ink.  Altering votes after they’re cast is not a realistic possibility.  The only post-vote alteration rationally likely is to complete an under-vote on a paper ballot.

 

An under-vote is where a voter does not vote for any of the options.  Most under-votes are done in uncontested races.  Often there will be under-votes down the ballot from the prime race.  County coroner, city dogcatcher, “should the village annex ten acres to create a municipal complex”; voters sometimes do not vote for these.  When the prize fight on the card is the presidential race, don’t expect more than a few under-votes per million.  The entire ballot being under-voted except for the top race is virtually unheard of.  …which we will get to later.

What is far more likely to happen in changing votes after they are cast is to have the machine register a vote in the wrong column or not at all.  In Antrim County Michigan, on the summertime-snow Lake Michigan coast between Traverse City and Mackinac, where republicans outnumber democrats by almost 2:1, initial vote results showed the democrat presidential candidate leading the republican by that same rough margin.  Suspecting something was up, the republican-led county election board hand-counted their 17,000-and-some-odd ballots and discovered a 6,000 vote swing.  Instead of winning by about 3,500 votes, Sniffy P lost by 2,500.  It was always a Trump vote recorded for Biden, and never the other way around.

 

The error was dismissed as a “glitch” by the software designers of the Dominion Voting Systems.  Antrim County hadn’t updated their software as scheduled; that was the reason said Michigan’s democrat Secretary of State.  …because out-of-date software is designed to deliberately malfunction as a means of inspiring users to purchase the next version.

 

Who does Dominion think they are? Microsoft?

No, no, it’s because an update was uploaded the day before the election by a company technician.  In any event, the software company [“INFINITE ways to serve the unique needs of every election” indeed] − which donates heavily to democrat causes and candidates, and has Pelosi, Clinton and Soros connections among their directors and paid lobbyists − is remaining [go figure] silent on the matter.  The fact that these systems have been implicated in giving psychotically erroneous election results in South Korea and in previous US elections means nothing.  Nor does the fact that multiple counties across the country have reported similar “irregularities” in the 2020 general election, including one county in Wisconsin with a 19,000 vote mistabulation, again always turning an R-vote D and never the other way around.

 

This software system is used in most counties in Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and 25 other states including all the so-called swing-states.  Another coincidence, I’m sure.

 

Those crying foul about this election are pinning most of their hopes on recounts, the mechanism by which the second illegality is discovered: altering the vote-counting so that 2+2=whatever is desired.  While there are often a handful of votes that originally didn’t register in the optical scanner that were tallied the second time, and [far more troubling] a newly-discovered cache of uncounted ballots from the back room, recounts have zero ability to determine the legitimacy of the ballot itself.  The issue with this election is vote fraud, not arithmetic.

 

The vote fraud most likely to occur [and not run the risk of being corrected by wary county clerks verifying the Dominion tabulations against the actual ballots] is the type made most possible by conditions specific to this election: a population made paranoid and fearful of being around other people in the form of, say, voting in person with a thousand other people.  It’s not fair to deny paranoid democrats a vote simply because they’re paranoid, so the government must accommodate their desires: let them vote by mail.  What could go wrong?

 

Critics of vote-by-mail critics are quick to point out that we’ve had mail-in ballots for generations.  That is not exactly true.  We’ve had absentee voting for generations.  These ballots are mailed; the similarities end there. The differences between absentee voting and voting by mail are important.

 

Absentee voting requires a lawful reason to not vote in person; voting by mail does not.  And critically, absentee voting requires the ballot to be notarized; voting by mail does not.

 

Indeed, Texas attempted to accommodate its own paranoid democrats by expanding the legally allowed reasons to vote absentee to include [effectively] “I don’ wanna vote in person”.  For their efforts, the state of Texas was sued by democrat party operatives claiming that this was too little effort, and amounted to voter suppression.  When asked how this suppresses votes, democrats trotted out their go-to excuse: it’s racist to make voters verify who they are by [in this case] having their ballots notarized.  Notaries require ID.  Voter ID is racist, primarily because democrats say so.

 

As a means to placate this whine, Texas offered a compromise: any voter who is 65 or older does not have to get his ballot notarized.  This alternative did not satisfy the democrats. 

Democrats in Missouri also used the courts in attempt to compel vote-by-mail allowance.  As I recall, the courts ruled that legislative inaction is not tortable.  In any event, neither Texas nor Missouri adopted vote-by-mail as demanded.

 

States having the loosest vote-by-mail provisions are figuring most heavily − also most notoriously − in the controversy surrounding this election.  Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia.  Michigan, as noted above, had 14,000 dead people voting by unnotarized mail-in ballot.  [Creepy Joe Biden is being nominated for sainthood by the Catholic Church for having raised so many thousands from the dead on election day].

All but North Carolina enjoyed a specific set of election irregularities concerning their mail-in votes as well.  All but North Carolina went Sniffy P in a big way in the wee hours of Wednesday morning.  …which, in itself, is extremely suspect.

 

In most elections, the democrat-heavy urban areas are counted first.  They have more money and usually more modern equipment.  Vote counting goes quickly.  The republican-heavy rural regions of a state have less modern equipment and vote counting goes slower.  It is not uncommon in swing states to have the democrat candidate jump out to an early lead only to be whittled down as the rural precincts come rolling in and have the republican pull close or even take the lead late at night or very early the next morning.  That was what happened in, most recently, 2016.  Medusa’s smiles turned to alcohol-aided tantrum between 11pm Tuesday and 1am Wednesday.  Her crowd was caught on camera supplying four years of tear-stained internet memes at the same time.

 

This year, in all the key states but North Carolina, vote counters in democrat-heavy urban areas were told to go home a few hours after the polls closed.  This happened in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, Detroit Michigan, Atlanta Georgia and Madison and Milwaukee Wisconsin.  Precincts in these cities stopped counting their votes.  Donnie Combover was, at the time, in a quite comfortable lead in these states. 

 

To say that telling the vote-counters to go home before they finished counting is highly irregular is to put it mildly; it has never happened before.  Meanwhile, the republican-heavy rural areas kept counting.  Then, sometime in the middle of the night, right around 3am [CST] in PA and WI, there was a vote dump of several thousand to over a hundred thousand votes − all for Sniffy P − all coming from democrat-heavy urban districts where the election workers had been sent home.  “Mail-in votes” was the official explanation.

 

…mail-in votes that couldn’t have been counted because those whose job it was to count them were all at home and [presumably] in bed.  In Wisconsin, the jump was nearly 140,000 to 0.

In MI, the vote jump was also several thousand to zero, and it occurred at just after 6am on Wednesday morning, before the poll workers who’d been sent home the night before came back to count the votes that had [apparently] largely been counted without them:

 

Just suppose I were a deceitful democrat, which is fairly redundant, with political pull in a swing state and desperate to remove an opposition candidate from the office that − to my chagrin − he is executing fairly effectively, all things considered, and I have a new-found tool of unverified mail-in voting at my disposal.  How might I ensure that this despised opposition candidate lose the election in my state and give electoral votes to my preferred candidate?

 

Just a few easy steps.

 

1] For every election official of my party there is, by law, an election official of the other party; each pair are figuratively joined at the hip for every step of the election process.  To ensure that republicans in democrat-heavy precincts don’t get wise to what I’m about to do [let alone the possibility that someone from my own party has a conscience], send ALL election officials from certain urban centers home at around 10pm on election night.  Tell them to get a good night’s sleep because it’s going to be a long haul from here on out.

 

2] By midnight, most rural counties will have their votes tabulated, and we’ll know by how many votes our democrat candidate is losing.  We’ll also have the names of everyone who voted and − most importantly − those who did not vote.

 

3] Between midnight and oh-dark-thirty, while the poll workers are all at home resting up, get party operatives to generate enough mail-in votes in the names of voters in urban precincts who did not vote that your candidate either goes ahead or will be assured of going ahead based on the voting patterns of the precincts still outstanding.  To make the process easier, and to incur less wrath [and fewer calls for investigation] from down-ballot candidates, only fill out the presidential race.

 

4] Count these votes and have them added to the [more/less] official tabulation while the other party’s Nosy Nellies are sawing logs.  Stick the ginned-up ballots into the great wad of other, legitimate, mail-ins [sic] to make it harder to separate them out later.

 

An interesting feature of this election, seen in no other, ever, in the history of US elections, is that hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots − and mail-in ballots only − are under-voted in all races except the presidential race at the top of the ballot.  Probably a coincidence.

Also a coincidence is that these all-but-one-race under-votes on the easily defrauded mail-in ballots are primarily seen in the four states in question: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia.

The last coincidence is that they have primarily occurred in the metropolitan areas where the poll workers had been sent home.

 

Wow.  Donnie Combover must be ultra despicable that he inspired over a million people to vote only against him and neither for nor against any other candidate or ballot initiative − many coming back from the grave to do so.  There’s nothing to see.  It’s all perfectly reasonable.  After all, it was President Cheeto himself who said that mail-in voting was fraud waiting to happen; his voters voted in person.  If you see anything untoward in all this it’s only because you’re a conspiracy theorist.

 

The primary means of responding to this has been to call for yet another recount.  Unless recounts are being used as a delay tactic in an overall strategy [in the same way that sending poll workers home on election night in D-heavy precincts was a delay tactic in the democrats’ strategy], it is beyond useless.  A recount is only concerned with whether the inked-in bubble on the ballot was tallied into the correct candidate vote column, and not whether the ballot itself was fraudulently provided.

 

Unfortunately, the ability to prove − to a legal standard − the invalidity of an individual mail-in ballot, let alone the hundreds of thousands across four states needed to be thrown out in order to materially affect this election, is lost.  It was lost when the ballot was separated from the mailer and signature page.  It doesn’t matter that president-only votes are billions-to-one rare in any election except this one, where there were around a million such ballots, mainly in only these four states.  They might have been legitimate, and you can’t prove they weren’t.  You can’t prove they weren’t because you no longer know who mailed that ballot.  If you did, you could go to that person and ask, “Did you actually vote in this election? and did you vote only for Sniffy P?”

 

I would be willing to bet a case of my homebrew Russian Imperial Stout that if we could go back to the people in whose names those million under-voted ballots were cast in favor of Creepy Joe that all but two or three would deny having voted at all.  But … we can’t do that at this point, and the claim that these are fraudulent votes can’t be proven.  So unless Newton’s Third Law applies to socio-political interactions [and I firmly believe it does, although rarely this rapidly] and we get an equal and opposite set of unbelievable coincidences that result in two, three or four state elections winding up in their respective legislatures to be determined that way, we will have a successfully stolen election that no one can prove was stolen.

 

Nor that it wasn’t, for what it’s worth.

 

With that in mind, let me be among the last to congratulate ex-president-elect Sniffy P deFile for his thievery on behalf of his successor [I give him until July − “resignation for health reasons”], Camel-uh Veshya Harris, who will do her damnedest to ensure the transition of democracy to dictatorship continues apace.  Be prepared for increased disarmament edicts, state enemy lists, mandatory government permissions to travel or conduct commercial transactions and criminal prosecutions of self-defense from attacks by state-approved Brownshirts.

 

Let the Kristallnachting continue.

Take a Gallop on the Wild Side

 

Take a Gallop on the Wild Side

©2020  Ross Williams

 

 

 

In my late 20s and early 30s, during the administration of Read My Lips Daddy H-Dub, I was what most people would consider an enviro-simp or eco-freak.  A tree hugger.

 

I’m no longer an eco-freak, but I am ecologically-minded.  I routinely pick up other people’s trash [though my wife claims I leave mine all over the house], recycle religiously, and re-use everything I possibly can.  I’m also still a tree hugger.  And a tree talker.  Yeller.  Screamer.  A half decade after Daddy H-Dub I acquired five acres of ex-wheat field and converted it into a small livestock farm with a wide assortment of trees that I hold regular, loud and profane conversations with, mostly having to do with their insistence on decapitating me as I try to mow around them.

 

But in the early 90s I read Mother Jones and tried really hard to like what I read.  I didn’t.  I found most of its content to be preachy pseudo-piety and intellectually insulting.  The rest was merely axiomatically presumptuous choir-preaching.  I also got the Seventh Generation catalog − they had a catalog at the time − and I ordered stuff out of it.  Most of what I ordered, soap and deodorant and laundry detergent mostly, did not work well, some not at all, and coupled with the exorbitant price made for a stupendously bad bargain.

At the same time, I was reading Scientific American and other semi-legitimate science journals.  Among the things I read in these were several discussions about the dangers and long-term effects of POPs − persistent organic pollutants.  This was less than a full generation after the end of the Vietnam War when some of the ex-hippies among us were still hair-shirting about Agent Orange in great, sloppy, bawling tirades.

 

Agent Orange contains dioxin, a class of chemicals known to cause birth defects as well as “developmental disorders”.  This is a catch-all term for any number of conditions which impairs a petulant, whiny teenager dripping with self-indulgence and delusions of omniscience from making the successful transition to a normal, self-doubting but still self-sufficient adult who knows his limitations and obeys them.  These developmental disorders may be purely physiological, or psychological, or sexual … or a combination thereof.

According to the literature, the surest bet was for all of the above to happen: delayed, accelerated or inhibited physical and psycho-sexual development.  When the chemical agents responsible for developmental disorders affect a person’s endocrine system − as they nearly all do in one way or another − and interfere with hormonal communication between one part of a person’s body and another, they are called endocrine disruptors.  Adolescent and pre-pubertal exposures are considered the highest risk for long-term effects of endocrine disruption.

There are hundreds of endocrine disruptors endemic to modern technological society, but a handful are also native to the Periodic Table: lead, mercury, arsenic and chlorine are the biggies.  Fluoride, a simple and ubiquitous compound, is another chemical responsible for messing with a growing endocrine system.  But at least you’ll have strong, healthy teeth as you retain your 14 year-old worldview.  That’s something.

 

The rest of the endocrine disruptors are complex chemical frankensteins.  Most people are aware of − or at least unsurprised by − the general sources of these problem chemicals.  Industrial solvents; cosmetics and toiletries additives [particularly unidentified “fragrance”]; bleaches and dyes; pesticides, herbicides and other agricultural chemicals; plastic leachates; highly processed food; paint; fire retardants and stain blockers; white paper… the list is nearly endless.

 

It is interesting to note − to me, anyway − that virtually all herbicides are carcinogens and endocrine disruptors except glyphosate, the active ingredient in the Monsanto/Bayer product Round-Up ®.  Glyphosate has shown no involvement in human endocrine dysfunction, and while the science is, at best, inconclusive on its actual carcinogenic properties, its makers have lost many lawsuits over it.  Yet the known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors in the pantheon of herbicides are largely lawsuit-free.  For some reason.

 

At any rate, it seems that virtually everything in our modern, techno-industrial world is trying to interfere with a person’s endocrine system, most of which screw with sexual development, and often affecting the emotional development that goes along with it.  And that’s not to include the natural sources of sexual development screwery found in, primarily, legumes.  Peas, lentils and beans contain high amounts of pseudo-estrogens.  The biggest culprit in this area is, of course, soybeans with all the well-earned satire that goes with it.  Soyboys are an actual thing.

 

I shouldn’t need to point this out, but I shall anyway.  The preponderance of chemical interference with human sexual development is a known First World Problem.  This is not even marginally debatable.  Issues with “sexual identity” − which have been reclassified as Gender Spectrum by academic simpletons − are virtually unknown outside of “The West”.

 

Also virtually unknown outside of “The West” are the broad classes of complex chemical endocrine disruptors.  Do we really need to point out the obvious here?  Chemicals which alter a person’s sexual and emotional development through puberty create results that are not normal or natural.

 

Adult men and women with the emotional maturity of mid-pubescent boys and girls is not normal, nor is it natural.

 

Adult men and women with the emotional maturity of young teenage boys and girls and with a sexual attraction to teenage boys and girls is not normal, nor is it natural.

Adult men who believe they are adult women is not normal, nor is it natural.

Adult women who believe they are adult men is not normal, nor is it natural.

 

The same people who bitterly and marxistly complain about large corporations and technological society for the profits they make “on the backs of the workers” don’t seem to register that those workers are, effectively, mutants.

The same people who wet their panties about corporations and technological society for the environmental damage they believe is being caused by carbon dioxide − a natural compound mandatory for life on this planet to exist − refuse to acknowledge the poisoning of the human race by the man-made chemicals that permeate the environment.

The same people who howl at the moon about corporations and technological society for poisoning the human race with frankenstinian chemicals merely “suspected” to be carcinogens deliberately ignore those same chemicals for their known ability to create adults with a sexual and emotional maturity of a 14 year-old − and a sexual appetite to match.

Why did the outrage over endocrine disruptors and the psycho-sexual havoc they wreak virtually disappear from mainstream outrage in the mid-90s? …possibly coincidentally during the Clinton Administration?

 

Why is a growing portion of academia currently justifying pedophilia as a viable lifestyle?

 

Why do the Alphabet People fling so much outrage at those who know − and say − that gender multiplicity isn’t a normal thing rather than at the witches brew which created their psycho-sexual aberrance in the first place?

 

Why are we so tortiously concerned about Round-Up ® maybe causing cancer than we are with the PFCs, glycol ethers and organophosphates which do cause cancer …and psycho-sexual dysfunction to boot?

 

If I were the arch-enemy of Uncle Sam searching for a way to slowly and inconspicuously render the US impotent and irrelevant, you can be sure this would be among the kryptonites I’d be looking at.