When in the Country, Reprise
I'll have to
admit, Mr "I Want to Be a Good Neighbor", that you had me worried for
a while. First you came over
condescendingly announcing that our dogs had destroyed your newly-poured concrete
driveway. I was imagining deep furrows
in fresh, gray, liquid stone made by our two dogs, The Stupids, tear-assing
after a squirrel or rabbit unlucky enough to be out at the same time as they
were and which they spotted, eagle-eye as only dogs can do, in your brand new subdivision
sprouting obscenely in the soybean field across the private country lane from
our farmhouse — the same subdivision that is raising property tax rates for all
homes three miles in every direction and will force another batch of farms out
of existence. You probably won't notice
this side-effect, as it will come three, eight, seventeen years from now; most
self-centered jackasses don't notice such things, caught up, as they are, in
the self-righteous view that the world revolves around them and them alone.
You informed us that the cost of that concrete slab comprising but a small portion of your driveway — possibly as much as ten feet by thirty feet square — was $3,000. …which is what inspired me to think there must have been deep furrows sliced through it. Mere paw prints would add character and charm to the idyllic, bucolic existence you signed up for when you moved "to the country" to get away from the city where your neighbors are constantly in your face as you were in ours. Deep furrows would instead need to "be jack-hammered out", as you informed us your concrete contractor said was the only recourse … and implying that we were somehow responsible to write you a check then and there to pay for. "It's dog prints," you said your concrete guy told you … because "concrete guys" are notorious for being experts in wildlife tracking. Though I immediately doubted, in the extreme, the ability of your "concrete guy" to know what the hell he was talking about insofar as the identification of any paw prints was concerned, I would not have been surprised in the slightest to learn that a dog — or two, or three — had run furrows through unset concrete when tear-assing after a critter. We — I, and soon you — are in the country; it's what happens. Get used to it.
But ours are far from the only dogs around, a point you steadfastly refused to grasp despite my repeated efforts to inform you. For example, there's a blind chocolate lab living at the house next to us which waddles to and fro and bumps into almost everything in sight … as it were. She periodically takes up residence in our garage when she's tired of waddling and needs to gather the strength to find her way back home. Because we are the good neighbors you claim to aspire to being, we let her stay there for as long as she needs to. If we hear her owners calling for her while she's drooling by the lawnmower, we will go over and tell them that she's in our garage again and she's welcome to stay unless she needs to get home and do homework or something. Then the neighbors apologize for the inconvenience — which it isn't, by any stretch — follow us back to our garage on the far side of our house from theirs, and we have a chat about how our various children, our various gardens and fruit trees, or our various lives in general are doing.
This, for your information, is what good neighbors do. What good neighbors do not do is ring the doorbell, then say " we want to be good neighbors," and then immediately prove themselves to be liars by making false accusations about the people and their dogs they just visited. These are subtle differences to citified weenies, I realize, but you are now "in the country" and it's your duty and obligation to learn to discern — and then abide by — those distinctions.
As far as the other neighborhood dogs roaming the vicinity go, there are at least three dogs living beyond the tree line on the far side of your house which periodically parade through the soybean field you [and your various new arrivals] are assassinating with your McMansion constructions. These dogs drive ours bonkers and our Stupids bark their fool heads off for hours at the mere memory of the smell of these interlopers wafting across the field. One of your soybean field cohort has an old and arthritic yellow lab which hobbles around whenever it finds itself having the energy to do so … which also drives our dogs nuts. The guy who bought the 80 acres of soybeans your subdivision is being obscenely built upon, and from whom you bought your lot, and lives in its far corner has a thick-haired mutt of some type which terrorizes all the dogs in a two square mile area … including ours. This bully dog pals around with three other dogs from among the houses in your obscene new subdivision, dogs both large and small. Our Stupids, if loose, will stand on our porch and howl about this pack of dogs, having been beaten up by them too many times to do much else.
You informed us that the cost of that concrete slab comprising but a small portion of your driveway — possibly as much as ten feet by thirty feet square — was $3,000. …which is what inspired me to think there must have been deep furrows sliced through it. Mere paw prints would add character and charm to the idyllic, bucolic existence you signed up for when you moved "to the country" to get away from the city where your neighbors are constantly in your face as you were in ours. Deep furrows would instead need to "be jack-hammered out", as you informed us your concrete contractor said was the only recourse … and implying that we were somehow responsible to write you a check then and there to pay for. "It's dog prints," you said your concrete guy told you … because "concrete guys" are notorious for being experts in wildlife tracking. Though I immediately doubted, in the extreme, the ability of your "concrete guy" to know what the hell he was talking about insofar as the identification of any paw prints was concerned, I would not have been surprised in the slightest to learn that a dog — or two, or three — had run furrows through unset concrete when tear-assing after a critter. We — I, and soon you — are in the country; it's what happens. Get used to it.
But ours are far from the only dogs around, a point you steadfastly refused to grasp despite my repeated efforts to inform you. For example, there's a blind chocolate lab living at the house next to us which waddles to and fro and bumps into almost everything in sight … as it were. She periodically takes up residence in our garage when she's tired of waddling and needs to gather the strength to find her way back home. Because we are the good neighbors you claim to aspire to being, we let her stay there for as long as she needs to. If we hear her owners calling for her while she's drooling by the lawnmower, we will go over and tell them that she's in our garage again and she's welcome to stay unless she needs to get home and do homework or something. Then the neighbors apologize for the inconvenience — which it isn't, by any stretch — follow us back to our garage on the far side of our house from theirs, and we have a chat about how our various children, our various gardens and fruit trees, or our various lives in general are doing.
This, for your information, is what good neighbors do. What good neighbors do not do is ring the doorbell, then say " we want to be good neighbors," and then immediately prove themselves to be liars by making false accusations about the people and their dogs they just visited. These are subtle differences to citified weenies, I realize, but you are now "in the country" and it's your duty and obligation to learn to discern — and then abide by — those distinctions.
As far as the other neighborhood dogs roaming the vicinity go, there are at least three dogs living beyond the tree line on the far side of your house which periodically parade through the soybean field you [and your various new arrivals] are assassinating with your McMansion constructions. These dogs drive ours bonkers and our Stupids bark their fool heads off for hours at the mere memory of the smell of these interlopers wafting across the field. One of your soybean field cohort has an old and arthritic yellow lab which hobbles around whenever it finds itself having the energy to do so … which also drives our dogs nuts. The guy who bought the 80 acres of soybeans your subdivision is being obscenely built upon, and from whom you bought your lot, and lives in its far corner has a thick-haired mutt of some type which terrorizes all the dogs in a two square mile area … including ours. This bully dog pals around with three other dogs from among the houses in your obscene new subdivision, dogs both large and small. Our Stupids, if loose, will stand on our porch and howl about this pack of dogs, having been beaten up by them too many times to do much else.
These are all dogs that we see on a daily basis, free and loose and wandering through the field that will become your yard, and does not include either those dogs which only make occasional trips, nor the indigenous coyotes that you will hear howling on a nightly basis when you finally take up residence in your fancy-ass new house — howling usually between 11pm and 4am — in choruses of alpha male-headed packs, or in the plaintive wails of forlorn single male coyotes looking for a date. Frankly, I'd lay good money that a "concrete guy" couldn't tell a coyote track from a dog track under the best of circumstances let alone one where he was trying to humor a self-important anal-retentive jackass whining about his concrete driveway. But of course, since ours are the dogs that you see most frequently on your thrice-weekly visits to your unfinished home merely because of their proximity, ours are the only ones who could have possibly dug the furrows that will cause you to have $3,000 of concrete shattered and replaced.
Second, I was puzzled and insulted by your insistence that you "grew up on a farm", since you seemed to have no comprehension to my explanation that dogs tend to keep coyotes away — coyotes will avoid confrontation at virtually all costs with anything even remotely near their size. This includes adult humans, and loose dogs bigger than a rat terrier. I've personally chased away three coyotes from my property this calendar year alone, including a pup which was bold enough [or desperate enough] to circle our house and pause long enough to be photographed. The only time the neighbors' dog from two fields behind us has gotten to our hens is when our dogs were penned up. The only time we've seen coyotes anywhere near [and this includes in the soybean field you are murdering for your McMansion] is when our dogs have been penned up or inside. If you "grew up on a farm" as you [undoubtedly falsely] claimed, then you'd know this. It seemed, though, as if this were the first time you'd heard such a silly thing. I could see the idea churning it's slow way through your self-involved brain as you stood uninvited on my porch slandering us with your hand out waiting for our money: "Dogs keep coyotes away? How preposterous!"
It's not silly, Mr "I grew up on a farm, so I know all about it"; nor is it preposterous. I find it offensive in the extreme to be lied to. You literally crossed the street to offend me by lying to me. I'm well aware that lying about such trivialities is simply a symptom of the self-absorbed machiavellianism that jackasses such as yourself display in great oozing gobs, but it's not a "country" attitude. Simply because you drove past a farm as a child — once — on a family vacation when the interstate was closed due to a tractor trailer accident, and you stopped at a farm stand for an apple while taking the detour, does not mean you "grew up on a farm". My advice is that you cease telling people this mendacity, and cease it immediately. We have enough liars as it is; unless you're in politics, you don't need to become a bigger part of the problem than you already are.
Third, this
was our second meeting. We ran into you
once a few months back when your house was little more than a frame with
plywood sheathing. Two of my sons and I
had walked across the road to look at the [obscene] new construction killing
the country and the farm fields that comprise it, and you, your wife, and two
daughters showed up for one of your thrice-weekly inspections of the progress
on your house. You seemed very taken
aback by our presence, and despite us trying to be friendly to you, you were
having none of it. Yet you claimed when
you rang our doorbell that you moved to the country because you wanted the
country life and all that comes with it.
You can't have it both ways, pal. Dogs — your own or the neighbors — are an inextricable part of that life, and I will guarantee you that virtually everyone who lives within sight your house has taken a tour of its construction; I've watched them do it. We have inspected virtually every new construction in your obscene subdivision. When my house was being constructed nearly 20 years ago, the folks living within sight of it did the same thing, and then they told me about it. As I write this, my dogs [penned up] are going bananas. They are standing at attention, facing the front of my property — facing your new neighborhood. Upon inspection, I see the two children from your subdivision neighbor [the one with the old, arthritic yellow lab] crossing the small plot of remaining soybean field between your house and theirs, entering your property, and circling your house, peering in windows, and bouncing around in that innocent way of children who don't comprehend the anal-retentive territoriality of city-dwellers who hate the city and move to the country to get away from it, only to recreate every city shortcoming in all its condescending splendor, in the country. … the country, which does not want self-righteous jackasses such as yourself moving to it and changing it. We moved here to get away from people like you. Why can you not respect that?
You can't have it both ways, pal. Dogs — your own or the neighbors — are an inextricable part of that life, and I will guarantee you that virtually everyone who lives within sight your house has taken a tour of its construction; I've watched them do it. We have inspected virtually every new construction in your obscene subdivision. When my house was being constructed nearly 20 years ago, the folks living within sight of it did the same thing, and then they told me about it. As I write this, my dogs [penned up] are going bananas. They are standing at attention, facing the front of my property — facing your new neighborhood. Upon inspection, I see the two children from your subdivision neighbor [the one with the old, arthritic yellow lab] crossing the small plot of remaining soybean field between your house and theirs, entering your property, and circling your house, peering in windows, and bouncing around in that innocent way of children who don't comprehend the anal-retentive territoriality of city-dwellers who hate the city and move to the country to get away from it, only to recreate every city shortcoming in all its condescending splendor, in the country. … the country, which does not want self-righteous jackasses such as yourself moving to it and changing it. We moved here to get away from people like you. Why can you not respect that?
These kids' parents
have also inspected your house, as have the folks in nearly every house in your
subdivision. Your backyard faces my
front yard, after all; I have a good view of what goes on there. And you aren't in Kansas anymore. Learn it; live it.
Fourth, I was appalled by your declarations that "you
love dogs", that "you grew up with dogs", and that "our
dogs were quite friendly", but that you "didn't want our dogs on your
property". Why the hell not? Do you want coyotes wandering in as if they
own the place? …because they will. Do
you want raccoons and possums tearing through your garbage? I'll tell you right now the weekly garbage
pickups won't collect what's strewn all over your yard, and if the trash they
strew over your yard blows into ours [as the trade winds will most times dictate]
I am now inclined to pick it up and deposit it back in your yard for you. To this point, I collect all stray garbage
and put it in our trash can for the next weekly pickup, because that's another
thing good neighbors do, but I think now I'll make an exception … just for
you. You'll get your garbage back. And if it isn't your garbage, I'll just
assume it is, just like you assumed it was our dogs who destroyed your freshly-poured
concrete driveway.
Here's the thing, dimwit: If it's not our dogs, it'll be someone else's; this is the country, in case it escaped your attention. It's dogs, or it's wildlife. It's not optional; it'll be one or the other, and sometimes both. Among the wildlife you will attract in a yard free of dogs, apart from the coyotes, raccoons and opossums previously mentioned, are, in no particular order:
1] skunks, in abundance. They're always welcome, aren't they? And when a feral cat, bobcat, raccoon, possum, coyote, owl or other nocturnal skulker startles them and they spray … you are now responsible for the month-long stench. Congratulations.
Here's the thing, dimwit: If it's not our dogs, it'll be someone else's; this is the country, in case it escaped your attention. It's dogs, or it's wildlife. It's not optional; it'll be one or the other, and sometimes both. Among the wildlife you will attract in a yard free of dogs, apart from the coyotes, raccoons and opossums previously mentioned, are, in no particular order:
1] skunks, in abundance. They're always welcome, aren't they? And when a feral cat, bobcat, raccoon, possum, coyote, owl or other nocturnal skulker startles them and they spray … you are now responsible for the month-long stench. Congratulations.
2] foxes. And since
your yard is separated from ours by maybe a 12' wide gravel track, if any of
the foxes that you invite into the
area by imposing your childish "lock up your dog" mandate wander over
and kill my hens, I think you will become responsible for the cost of replacing
the hens and the cost of replacing the eggs we can no longer sell because they
can no longer lay. …because they're dead.
3] more mice and voles than we strictly need to have. Voles live in farm fields, empty lots and
woods, and are inescapable to those who live in the country. Their numbers are kept in check by hawks,
cats, coyotes, foxes, owls and dogs. But
foxes are unwelcome around farms with poultry, and coyotes are unwelcome,
period. To replace the predation of
foxes and coyotes, you need dogs. Let's
hope you don't have anything that rodents like to chew on … which is just about
anything that isn't stone or steel.
4] groundhogs. No
animal causes foundation damage quicker than a burrowing groundhog digging a
nest next to your poured concrete foundation — and they will invite themselves. Their
hole collects rainwater and roof drainage, the water sits next to your concrete
and leaches out the lime below the above-grade tarring. Lime makes the concrete waterproof and hard,
and your foundation cracks decades before it should. I'm surprised a guy who "grew up on a
farm" doesn't know this about groundhogs.
5] deer. You explained how you were going to be
planting trees and that these trees may keep our dogs out of your yard — more
proof, as if any were needed, that you are clueless about dogs, Mr "I grew
up with dogs", and which would have caused me to laugh right in your face
were I not so incensed about your snotty visit.
Trees, especially young trees with thin, tasty bark, are what deer feed
on in the winter. Before I got a dog four
years after I moved here, I lost probably a hundred trees to deer.
…which is another of the reasons I concluded you bald-facedly lied about
"growing up on a farm". Seriously. You whined in greasy unction because our dogs
were peeing on the stakes in your construction zone and on the sides of your
house. Clue, moron: male dogs pee on stakes and walls [and car tires, and trees, and fence
posts, and anything else which stands upright], female dogs squat and pee on
flat ground; only one of our dogs is male.
This is how male dogs "mark their territory", which you'd know
if anything you claimed about growing
up on a farm with dogs were true.
But all that
was yesterday. This morning, my wife and
I were taking our weekly trip to the groceries [multiple groceries, yes, and another
thing you'll need to get used to in the country — weekly grocery runs], and she
suggested we stop by your subdivision and look at your driveway for
ourselves. So we did. We took pictures.
At first all we could see was pure concrete, smoothed flat at the edge of each section, and ruffled in the center, just so, the way anal-retentive city folk trying to turn the country into the city demand it. "Had they already jack-hammered it out and poured new? …in just over 13 hours?" I thought. No, we would have seen and heard that. I walked closer, finally crouched down to get a close look, and there, barely discernable, were footprints of not-a-dog padding a gentle path across the concrete and not even digging in. They merely mar the striations of the finishing. The deepest indent might be as much as a millimeter, and you need to catch the light just right, and from a very low angle, to see a track of any sort.
At any rate, they are not dog prints. That much is evident to anyone who has either "grown up on a farm", "loves dogs", or "had dogs". Sorry to prove you [and your wildlife expert "concrete guy"] to be liars and/or ignoramuses. It's not even, as the sheriffs' deputy suggested, "probably raccoons" — raccoons have opposable thumbs and 'coon prints look like very small human hand prints. We googled many animal prints upon our return from the stores. Raccoons, possums, foxes, coyotes, skunks, woodchucks, … and finally dogs.
At first all we could see was pure concrete, smoothed flat at the edge of each section, and ruffled in the center, just so, the way anal-retentive city folk trying to turn the country into the city demand it. "Had they already jack-hammered it out and poured new? …in just over 13 hours?" I thought. No, we would have seen and heard that. I walked closer, finally crouched down to get a close look, and there, barely discernable, were footprints of not-a-dog padding a gentle path across the concrete and not even digging in. They merely mar the striations of the finishing. The deepest indent might be as much as a millimeter, and you need to catch the light just right, and from a very low angle, to see a track of any sort.
At any rate, they are not dog prints. That much is evident to anyone who has either "grown up on a farm", "loves dogs", or "had dogs". Sorry to prove you [and your wildlife expert "concrete guy"] to be liars and/or ignoramuses. It's not even, as the sheriffs' deputy suggested, "probably raccoons" — raccoons have opposable thumbs and 'coon prints look like very small human hand prints. We googled many animal prints upon our return from the stores. Raccoons, possums, foxes, coyotes, skunks, woodchucks, … and finally dogs.
The prints on the concrete driveway had none of these
characteristics. Instead, the footprints
on the driveway had a heel pad with four toe pads in front, no claw marks, and
the rear paw prints nearly landed on the forepaw prints.
All animals have claws, and all animal footprints display claw marks in one way or another in their foot prints … except cats. Cats' claws are retractable unless the cat is disfigured and cannot retract its claws. Only when cats are hunting or fighting [or sharpening] are their claws exposed. Furthermore, most cat species walk with a rear paw landing nearly where the opposite forepaw just left. … just like the prints on the "ruined" concrete driveway.
There are
literally dozens of cats which roam the neighborhood at night, and they're mostly
feral. There may be bobcats as well — I
don't stay up at night with infrared 'nocs to look for them. Our own cat is nearly twenty years old and
barely moves anymore. Besides that, she
was injured about ten years ago when a coyote attacked her, broke her left foreleg
and mangled her paw, and she cannot retract her left forepaw claws. Any footprints she leaves would have one paw
with claws and three paws without. None
of the cat prints in the concrete have claws; ergo, apart from it not being our
dogs making the catprints, it was not our cat, either.
More evidence? A dog and coyote print has a heel pad with two rear lobes; a cat's print has a heel pad with three rear lobes. The prints in the concrete show a heel pad with three rear lobes.
More evidence? A dog and coyote print has a heel pad with two rear lobes; a cat's print has a heel pad with three rear lobes. The prints in the concrete show a heel pad with three rear lobes.
Yes, if you
squint real hard, you can see actual footprints in the smoothed-off edges of
each concrete slab. But only if you squint real hard. And crouch down.
I had to
catch the light just right to see it at all.
The prints really are nearly invisible and cannot be seen at all from
most angles, which is what makes the whole visit by Mr "I want to be a
good neighbor" and his self-pitying, blame-laying, broadly-hinted-at
money-grubbing sob story so pathetic. If
there was a term that indicated a level of immaturity less than 'infantile' it
would apply to him.
And this one
shows the heel pad with a distinctive three-lobe rear, a rear paw landed nearly
on top of the forepaw, and there are two paw prints shown:
The unavoidable conclusion is that we were slanderously accused of being responsible for a faux-desecration which we are not responsible for, and which arguably didn't even occur. Can anyone see damage unless they are sticking their face right down into the concrete themselves? We couldn't. The only reason our "good neighbor" could is because he wanted to. And then he lashed out at the first people he could think of to falsely accuse of perpetrating it.
A very self-righteous "city" thing to do, by the way. A very immature thing to do as well.
And … not to repay "good neighborly" malicious false accusation in kind, or anything … but just like someone who poisons the neighbors' animals with antifreeze.
Y'see, two can play your game, Mr "Good Neighbor".
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home